↓ Skip to main content

A review of platelet secretion assays for the diagnosis of inherited platelet secretion disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Thrombosis and Haemostasis, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A review of platelet secretion assays for the diagnosis of inherited platelet secretion disorders
Published in
Thrombosis and Haemostasis, November 2017
DOI 10.1160/th14-11-0999
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew D Mumford, Andrew L Frelinger, Christian Gachet, Paolo Gresele, Patrizia Noris, Paul Harrison, Diego Mezzano

Abstract

Measurement of platelet granule release to detect inherited platelet secretion disorders (IPSDs) is essential for the evaluation of patients with abnormal bleeding and is necessary to distinguish which granule sub-types are affected and whether there is abnormal granule bio-synthesis or secretion. The radioactive serotonin incorporation and release assay, described before 1970, is still considered the "gold standard" test to assess platelet δ-granule release, although is unsuitable for clinical diagnostic laboratories. Luciferin-based assays, such as lumiaggregometry, are the most widely performed alternatives, although these methods do not distinguish defects in δ-granule biosynthesis from defects in secretion. Platelet α-granule release is commonly evaluated using flow cytometry by measuring surface exposure of P-selectin after platelet activation. However, this assay has poor sensitivity for some α-granule disorders. Only few studies have been published with more recently developed assays and no critical reviews on these methods are available. In this review, we describe the rationale for developing robust and accurate laboratory tests of platelet granule release and describe the characteristics of the currently available tests. We identify an unmet need for further systematic evaluation of new assays and for standardisation of methodologies for clinical diagnostic laboratories.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 95 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 16%
Student > Bachelor 15 15%
Student > Master 12 12%
Other 4 4%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 20 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 3%
Physics and Astronomy 2 2%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 26 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2015.
All research outputs
#20,286,650
of 22,821,814 outputs
Outputs from Thrombosis and Haemostasis
#3,594
of 3,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#371,319
of 436,535 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Thrombosis and Haemostasis
#1,762
of 1,916 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,821,814 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,855 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,535 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,916 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.