↓ Skip to main content

Potential Threat of Microplastics to Zooplanktivores in the Surface Waters of the Southern Sea of Korea

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
79 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
187 Mendeley
Title
Potential Threat of Microplastics to Zooplanktivores in the Surface Waters of the Southern Sea of Korea
Published in
Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, August 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00244-015-0210-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jung-Hoon Kang, Oh-Youn Kwon, Won Joon Shim

Abstract

The potential impact of microplastic to zooplanktivores was assessed by measuring a ratio of neustonic microplastics to zooplankton by abundance in the southern sea of Korea. Neustonic microplastics and zooplankton (0.33-2 mm) were collected using a 330-μm mesh Manta trawl in Geoje eastern Bay and Jinhae Bay before and after the rainy season in 2012 and 2013. The mean microplastic to zooplankton ratios were 0.086 (May) and 0.022 (July) in 2012, and 0.016 (June) and 0.004 (July) in 2013, indicating that zooplanktivores could be more likely to feed on microplastics than natural preys before the rainy season in 2012 and 2013. In particular, the relatively high ratio occurred in a semi-enclosed bay characterized by a shipyard and a beach resort in Geoje Bay, and at stations close to a wastewater treatment plant and an aquaculture facility in Jinhae Bay before the rainy season. Among dominant microplastics and zooplankton before the rainy season, meroplankton of macrobenthos could be confused with paint particles in Geoje Bay, 2012, whereas Styrofoam could be mistaken as immature copepods by predators in Jinhae Bay, 2013. These observations suggest that zooplanktivores could be more likely to feed on microplastics than natural preys around Geoje and Jinhae Bays before the rainy season.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 187 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Croatia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 184 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 29 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 14%
Student > Master 24 13%
Student > Bachelor 21 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 4%
Other 24 13%
Unknown 55 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 46 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 12%
Chemistry 11 6%
Engineering 8 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 3%
Other 15 8%
Unknown 78 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2022.
All research outputs
#6,530,305
of 24,727,020 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
#555
of 2,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,914
of 269,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
#10
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,727,020 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,209 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,788 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.