| Title |
Physical Properties of Venous Stents: An Experimental Comparison
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, February 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00270-018-1916-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Darius Dabir, Andreas Feisst, Daniel Thomas, Julian A. Luetkens, Carsten Meyer, Ana Kardulovic, Matthias Menne, Ulrich Steinseifer, Hans H. Schild, Daniel L. R. Kuetting |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 18 | 43% |
| Spain | 2 | 5% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Austria | 1 | 2% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Greece | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 14 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 19 | 45% |
| Members of the public | 19 | 45% |
| Scientists | 3 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 87 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 15% |
| Researcher | 12 | 14% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 9% |
| Other | 15 | 17% |
| Unknown | 19 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 31% |
| Engineering | 21 | 24% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 28 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,396,676
of 25,707,225 outputs
Outputs from CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
#23
of 2,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,200
of 345,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
#3
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,707,225 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,761 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,042 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.