↓ Skip to main content

Heavy Metals in Indigenous Preparations Used for Sex Selection During Pregnancy in India

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Trace Element Research, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
Title
Heavy Metals in Indigenous Preparations Used for Sex Selection During Pregnancy in India
Published in
Biological Trace Element Research, June 2018
DOI 10.1007/s12011-018-1411-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Abhijit Ganguli, Pragya Rai, Sarala Balachandran, Rakesh Gupta, Rashmi Sharma, Sutapa Bandyopadhyay Neogi

Abstract

Indigenous preparations (IPs) have evoked a considerable interest in alleviating infections and chronic diseases and improving wellbeing. While such formulations have been a part of traditional practice in several countries and many have been reviewed scientifically for their claims, several of them until date remain to be investigated. A class of IPs for sex selection by Indian pregnant women exists with an aim of begetting a male offspring. In view of the leads obtained from our previous studies on detrimental effects of the newborn, for instance stillbirths and congenital malformations, we attempted to investigate the samples for heavy metal toxicity. Three samples were chosen following phytochemical analysis and reproductive toxicity of such preparations under in vivo conditions. The selected samples were examined for heavy metals-lead, cadmium, arsenic, and mercury using Microwave-assisted atomic absorption spectroscopy. The upper limit level of lead, mercury, and cadmium was found to be 18.56, 0.11, and 0.84 mg/kg respectively whereas arsenic was not detected. The levels of lead and mercury were found to be manifolds high in the IP samples that were primarily contributed by its constituents. The results of our study indicate the potential risk conferred upon, to both the mother and fetus on account of high levels of lead, mercury, and cadmium.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 18%
Student > Master 4 10%
Unspecified 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 8 20%
Unknown 14 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 6 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 15%
Unspecified 3 8%
Environmental Science 2 5%
Engineering 2 5%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 15 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2018.
All research outputs
#20,522,137
of 23,090,520 outputs
Outputs from Biological Trace Element Research
#1,595
of 2,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#265,036
of 301,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Trace Element Research
#29
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,090,520 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,060 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 301,972 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.