You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A transcriptome-wide association study of 229,000 women identifies new candidate susceptibility genes for breast cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Genetics, June 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41588-018-0132-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lang Wu, Wei Shi, Jirong Long, Xingyi Guo, Kyriaki Michailidou, Jonathan Beesley, Manjeet K. Bolla, Xiao-Ou Shu, Yingchang Lu, Qiuyin Cai, Fares Al-Ejeh, Esdy Rozali, Qin Wang, Joe Dennis, Bingshan Li, Chenjie Zeng, Helian Feng, Alexander Gusev, Richard T. Barfield, Irene L. Andrulis, Hoda Anton-Culver, Volker Arndt, Kristan J. Aronson, Paul L. Auer, Myrto Barrdahl, Caroline Baynes, Matthias W. Beckmann, Javier Benitez, Marina Bermisheva, Carl Blomqvist, Natalia V. Bogdanova, Stig E. Bojesen, Hiltrud Brauch, Hermann Brenner, Louise Brinton, Per Broberg, Sara Y. Brucker, Barbara Burwinkel, Trinidad Caldés, Federico Canzian, Brian D. Carter, J. Esteban Castelao, Jenny Chang-Claude, Xiaoqing Chen, Ting-Yuan David Cheng, Hans Christiansen, Christine L. Clarke, NBCS Collaborators, Margriet Collée, Sten Cornelissen, Fergus J. Couch, David Cox, Angela Cox, Simon S. Cross, Julie M. Cunningham, Kamila Czene, Mary B. Daly, Peter Devilee, Kimberly F. Doheny, Thilo Dörk, Isabel dos-Santos-Silva, Martine Dumont, Miriam Dwek, Diana M. Eccles, Ursula Eilber, A. Heather Eliassen, Christoph Engel, Mikael Eriksson, Laura Fachal, Peter A. Fasching, Jonine Figueroa, Dieter Flesch-Janys, Olivia Fletcher, Henrik Flyger, Lin Fritschi, Marike Gabrielson, Manuela Gago-Dominguez, Susan M. Gapstur, Montserrat García-Closas, Mia M. Gaudet, Maya Ghoussaini, Graham G. Giles, Mark S. Goldberg, David E. Goldgar, Anna González-Neira, Pascal Guénel, Eric Hahnen, Christopher A. Haiman, Niclas Håkansson, Per Hall, Emily Hallberg, Ute Hamann, Patricia Harrington, Alexander Hein, Belynda Hicks, Peter Hillemanns, Antoinette Hollestelle, Robert N. Hoover, John L. Hopper, Guanmengqian Huang, Keith Humphreys, David J. Hunter, Anna Jakubowska, Wolfgang Janni, Esther M. John, Nichola Johnson, Kristine Jones, Michael E. Jones, Audrey Jung, Rudolf Kaaks, Michael J. Kerin, Elza Khusnutdinova, Veli-Matti Kosma, Vessela N. Kristensen, Diether Lambrechts, Loic Le Marchand, Jingmei Li, Sara Lindström, Jolanta Lissowska, Wing-Yee Lo, Sibylle Loibl, Jan Lubinski, Craig Luccarini, Michael P. Lux, Robert J. MacInnis, Tom Maishman, Ivana Maleva Kostovska, Arto Mannermaa, JoAnn E. Manson, Sara Margolin, Dimitrios Mavroudis, Hanne Meijers-Heijboer, Alfons Meindl, Usha Menon, Jeffery Meyer, Anna Marie Mulligan, Susan L. Neuhausen, Heli Nevanlinna, Patrick Neven, Sune F. Nielsen, Børge G. Nordestgaard, Olufunmilayo I. Olopade, Janet E. Olson, Håkan Olsson, Paolo Peterlongo, Julian Peto, Dijana Plaseska-Karanfilska, Ross Prentice, Nadege Presneau, Katri Pylkäs, Brigitte Rack, Paolo Radice, Nazneen Rahman, Gad Rennert, Hedy S. Rennert, Valerie Rhenius, Atocha Romero, Jane Romm, Anja Rudolph, Emmanouil Saloustros, Dale P. Sandler, Elinor J. Sawyer, Marjanka K. Schmidt, Rita K. Schmutzler, Andreas Schneeweiss, Rodney J. Scott, Christopher G. Scott, Sheila Seal, Mitul Shah, Martha J. Shrubsole, Ann Smeets, Melissa C. Southey, John J. Spinelli, Jennifer Stone, Harald Surowy, Anthony J. Swerdlow, Rulla M. Tamimi, William Tapper, Jack A. Taylor, Mary Beth Terry, Daniel C. Tessier, Abigail Thomas, Kathrin Thöne, Rob A. E. M. Tollenaar, Diana Torres, Thérèse Truong, Michael Untch, Celine Vachon, David Van Den Berg, Daniel Vincent, Quinten Waisfisz, Clarice R. Weinberg, Camilla Wendt, Alice S. Whittemore, Hans Wildiers, Walter C. Willett, Robert Winqvist, Alicja Wolk, Lucy Xia, Xiaohong R. Yang, Argyrios Ziogas, Elad Ziv, kConFab/AOCS Investigators, Alison M. Dunning, Paul D. P. Pharoah, Jacques Simard, Roger L. Milne, Stacey L. Edwards, Peter Kraft, Douglas F. Easton, Georgia Chenevix-Trench, Wei Zheng |
| Abstract |
The breast cancer risk variants identified in genome-wide association studies explain only a small fraction of the familial relative risk, and the genes responsible for these associations remain largely unknown. To identify novel risk loci and likely causal genes, we performed a transcriptome-wide association study evaluating associations of genetically predicted gene expression with breast cancer risk in 122,977 cases and 105,974 controls of European ancestry. We used data from the Genotype-Tissue Expression Project to establish genetic models to predict gene expression in breast tissue and evaluated model performance using data from The Cancer Genome Atlas. Of the 8,597 genes evaluated, significant associations were identified for 48 at a Bonferroni-corrected threshold of P < 5.82 × 10-6, including 14 genes at loci not yet reported for breast cancer. We silenced 13 genes and showed an effect for 11 on cell proliferation and/or colony-forming efficiency. Our study provides new insights into breast cancer genetics and biology. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 98 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 29 | 30% |
| Ireland | 8 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 4% |
| Spain | 4 | 4% |
| Japan | 3 | 3% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| Italy | 2 | 2% |
| Comoros | 1 | 1% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Unknown | 35 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 46 | 47% |
| Scientists | 43 | 44% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 300 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 300 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 54 | 18% |
| Researcher | 47 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 6% |
| Professor | 13 | 4% |
| Other | 56 | 19% |
| Unknown | 83 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 79 | 26% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 36 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 12% |
| Computer Science | 16 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 36 | 12% |
| Unknown | 93 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 106. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2023.
All research outputs
#404,687
of 25,756,531 outputs
Outputs from Nature Genetics
#812
of 7,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,719
of 342,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Genetics
#30
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,756,531 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,618 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,821 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.