You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Inducible Apoptosis as a Safety Switch for Adoptive Cell Therapy
|
---|---|
Published in |
New England Journal of Medicine, November 2011
|
DOI | 10.1056/nejmoa1106152 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Antonio Di Stasi, Siok-Keen Tey, Gianpietro Dotti, Yuriko Fujita, Alana Kennedy-Nasser, Caridad Martinez, Karin Straathof, Enli Liu, April G Durett, Bambi Grilley, Hao Liu, Conrad R Cruz, Barbara Savoldo, Adrian P Gee, John Schindler, Robert A Krance, Helen E Heslop, David M Spencer, Cliona M Rooney, Malcolm K Brenner |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 8% |
Comoros | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 22 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 20 | 80% |
Scientists | 3 | 12% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 8% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,052 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 7 | <1% |
Netherlands | 5 | <1% |
Germany | 2 | <1% |
France | 2 | <1% |
Canada | 2 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Turkey | 1 | <1% |
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
Other | 4 | <1% |
Unknown | 1026 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 226 | 21% |
Researcher | 178 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 126 | 12% |
Student > Master | 91 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 67 | 6% |
Other | 166 | 16% |
Unknown | 198 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 237 | 23% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 194 | 18% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 188 | 18% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 89 | 8% |
Engineering | 33 | 3% |
Other | 90 | 9% |
Unknown | 221 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 158. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2024.
All research outputs
#263,426
of 25,703,943 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#4,569
of 32,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#946
of 154,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#23
of 299 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,703,943 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,638 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 122.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 154,584 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 299 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.