| Title |
Contributions of a global network of tree diversity experiments to sustainable forest plantations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ambio, August 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13280-015-0685-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kris Verheyen, Margot Vanhellemont, Harald Auge, Lander Baeten, Christopher Baraloto, Nadia Barsoum, Simon Bilodeau-Gauthier, Helge Bruelheide, Bastien Castagneyrol, Douglas Godbold, Josephine Haase, Andy Hector, Hervé Jactel, Julia Koricheva, Michel Loreau, Simone Mereu, Christian Messier, Bart Muys, Philippe Nolet, Alain Paquette, John Parker, Mike Perring, Quentin Ponette, Catherine Potvin, Peter Reich, Andy Smith, Martin Weih, Michael Scherer-Lorenzen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 24% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 12% |
| Sweden | 1 | 6% |
| Ireland | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Germany | 1 | 6% |
| Finland | 1 | 6% |
| France | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 59% |
| Scientists | 4 | 24% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 415 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 404 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 85 | 20% |
| Researcher | 63 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 61 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 39 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 26 | 6% |
| Other | 64 | 15% |
| Unknown | 77 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 140 | 34% |
| Environmental Science | 138 | 33% |
| Engineering | 7 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 7 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 21 | 5% |
| Unknown | 97 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2016.
All research outputs
#3,702,366
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Ambio
#686
of 1,981 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,156
of 279,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ambio
#11
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,981 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,752 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.