↓ Skip to main content

Sampling from Dirichlet process mixture models with unknown concentration parameter: mixing issues in large data implementations

Overview of attention for article published in Statistics and Computing, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
Title
Sampling from Dirichlet process mixture models with unknown concentration parameter: mixing issues in large data implementations
Published in
Statistics and Computing, May 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11222-014-9471-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

David I. Hastie, Silvia Liverani, Sylvia Richardson

Abstract

We consider the question of Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling from a general stick-breaking Dirichlet process mixture model, with concentration parameter [Formula: see text]. This paper introduces a Gibbs sampling algorithm that combines the slice sampling approach of Walker (Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation 36:45-54, 2007) and the retrospective sampling approach of Papaspiliopoulos and Roberts (Biometrika 95(1):169-186, 2008). Our general algorithm is implemented as efficient open source C++ software, available as an R package, and is based on a blocking strategy similar to that suggested by Papaspiliopoulos (A note on posterior sampling from Dirichlet mixture models, 2008) and implemented by Yau et al. (Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B (Statistical Methodology) 73:37-57, 2011). We discuss the difficulties of achieving good mixing in MCMC samplers of this nature in large data sets and investigate sensitivity to initialisation. We additionally consider the challenges when an additional layer of hierarchy is added such that joint inference is to be made on [Formula: see text]. We introduce a new label-switching move and compute the marginal partition posterior to help to surmount these difficulties. Our work is illustrated using a profile regression (Molitor et al. Biostatistics 11(3):484-498, 2010) application, where we demonstrate good mixing behaviour for both synthetic and real examples.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Korea, Republic of 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Japan 1 2%
Russia 1 2%
Unknown 58 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 31%
Researcher 15 23%
Other 5 8%
Student > Postgraduate 5 8%
Student > Master 5 8%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 6 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 21 32%
Computer Science 9 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 8%
Engineering 4 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 12 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2016.
All research outputs
#5,879,961
of 22,821,814 outputs
Outputs from Statistics and Computing
#99
of 502 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,236
of 227,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Statistics and Computing
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,821,814 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 502 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,660 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.