↓ Skip to main content

Describing Patterns of Care in Pancreatic Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Pancreas, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Describing Patterns of Care in Pancreatic Cancer
Published in
Pancreas, November 2015
DOI 10.1097/mpa.0000000000000384
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth A. Burmeister, Dianne L. O'Connell, Vanessa L. Beesley, David Goldstein, Helen M. Gooden, Monika Janda, Susan J. Jordan, Neil D. Merrett, Madeleine E. Payne, David Wyld, Rachel E. Neale

Abstract

Despite pancreatic cancer being the fifth highest cause of cancer death in developed regions, there is a paucity of population-based management details for patients with pancreatic cancer. The objective of this study was to reflect on current practice and outcomes to facilitate future improvement. A comprehensive population-based patterns-of-care study in 2 Australian states was conducted. Patients diagnosed with pancreatic adenocarcinoma between July 2009 and June 2011 were identified by cancer registries, and detailed clinical data were collected from medical records. Data were collected for 1863 patients, 96% of those eligible. The majority resided in major cities; their median age was 72 years, and 54% were men. Over half of the cases (58%) had metastatic disease at diagnosis. Resection was attempted for 20% of patients but only completed in 15%. The uptake of adjuvant chemotherapy (76%) and the proportion alive at 1-year (22%) were higher than reported in previous population-based reports. Of those with no complete surgical resection, 43% received palliative chemotherapy. This population-based overview of the management of patients with pancreatic cancer suggests that, despite evidence that the proportion surviving and the use of adjuvant chemotherapy has increased, there may still be underutilization of cancer-directed therapies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Poland 1 3%
Unknown 35 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Professor 4 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 10 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 10 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2015.
All research outputs
#16,011,208
of 25,775,807 outputs
Outputs from Pancreas
#1,033
of 2,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,137
of 295,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pancreas
#13
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,775,807 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,936 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,733 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.