↓ Skip to main content

Focused Update on Pharmacologic Management of Hypertensive Emergencies

Overview of attention for article published in Current Hypertension Reports, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
Title
Focused Update on Pharmacologic Management of Hypertensive Emergencies
Published in
Current Hypertension Reports, June 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11906-018-0854-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kristin Watson, Rachael Broscious, Sandeep Devabhakthuni, Zachary R. Noel

Abstract

Hypertensive emergency is defined as a systolic blood pressure > 180 mmHg or a diastolic blood pressure > 120 mmHg with evidence of new or progressive end-organ damage. The purpose of this paper is to review advances in the treatment of hypertensive emergencies within the last 5 years. New literature and recommendations for managing hypertensive emergencies in the setting of pregnancy, stroke, and heart failure have been published. Oral nifedipine is now considered an alternative first-line therapy, along with intravenous hydralazine and labetalol for women presenting with pre-eclampsia. Clevidipine is now endorsed by guidelines as a first-line treatment option for blood pressure reduction in acute ischemic stroke and may be considered for use in intracranial hemorrhage. Treatment of hypertensive heart failure remains challenging; clevidipine and enalaprilat can be considered for use in this population although data supporting their use remains limited.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 96 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 11 11%
Researcher 10 10%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 9%
Student > Master 9 9%
Other 16 17%
Unknown 31 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 45%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 1%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 32 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2018.
All research outputs
#13,102,483
of 23,090,520 outputs
Outputs from Current Hypertension Reports
#369
of 734 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,020
of 328,959 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Hypertension Reports
#13
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,090,520 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 734 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,959 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.