↓ Skip to main content

Using design strategies from microfluidic device patents to support idea generation

Overview of attention for article published in Microfluidics and Nanofluidics, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
Title
Using design strategies from microfluidic device patents to support idea generation
Published in
Microfluidics and Nanofluidics, June 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10404-018-2089-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jin Woo Lee, Shanna R. Daly, Aileen Y. Huang-Saad, Colleen M. Seifert, Jacob Lutz

Abstract

Microfluidics has been an important method in providing answers to a wide variety of research questions in chemistry, biochemistry, and biology. Microfluidic designers benefit from instructional textbooks describing foundational principles and practices in developing microfluidic devices; however, these texts do not offer guidance about how to generate design concepts for microfluidic devices. Research on design in related fields, such as mechanical engineering, documents the difficulties engineers face when attempting to generate novel ideas. For microfluidic device designers, support during idea generation may lead to greater exploration of potential innovations in design. To investigate successful idea generation in microfluidics, we analyzed successful microfluidic US patents, selecting those with the key word "microfluidic" over a 2-year period. After analyzing the features and functions of 235 patents, we identified 36 distinct design strategies in microfluidic devices. We document each strategy, and demonstrate their usefulness in a concept generation study of practitioners in microfluidic design. While some of the identified design strategies may be familiar to microfluidic designers, exposure to this large set of strategies helped participants generate more diverse, creative, and unique microfluidic design concepts, which are considered best practices in idea generation.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 56 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 25%
Student > Master 8 14%
Other 3 5%
Researcher 3 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 13 23%
Unknown 12 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 13 23%
Chemistry 7 13%
Design 5 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Unspecified 2 4%
Other 11 20%
Unknown 15 27%