| Title |
A theory of focus interpretation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Natural Language Semantics, February 1992
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02342617 |
| Authors |
Mats Rooth |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 399 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 2% |
| Germany | 4 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| India | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
| Uganda | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 2% |
| Unknown | 369 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 130 | 33% |
| Student > Master | 56 | 14% |
| Researcher | 33 | 8% |
| Professor | 27 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 26 | 7% |
| Other | 79 | 20% |
| Unknown | 48 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Linguistics | 269 | 67% |
| Computer Science | 19 | 5% |
| Philosophy | 13 | 3% |
| Psychology | 12 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 10 | 3% |
| Other | 21 | 5% |
| Unknown | 55 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2022.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Natural Language Semantics
#24
of 117 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,818
of 63,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Language Semantics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 117 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 63,036 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them