| Title |
Characterization of a homogenous preparation of carboxysomes from Thiobacillus neapolitanus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archives of Microbiology, January 1983
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00429407 |
| Authors |
G. C. Cannon, J. M. Shively |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 38 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 35% |
| Researcher | 11 | 26% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 5 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 42% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 26% |
| Chemistry | 5 | 12% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 2% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 6 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2022.
All research outputs
#7,582,522
of 23,122,481 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Microbiology
#578
of 2,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,979
of 33,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Microbiology
#5
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,122,481 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,809 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 33,626 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.