| Title |
Do conservation and agri-environmental regulations effectively support traditional small-scale farming in East-Central European cultural landscapes?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, August 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-015-0971-z |
| Authors |
Dániel Babai, Antónia Tóth, István Szentirmai, Marianna Biró, András Máté, László Demeter, Mátyás Szépligeti, Anna Varga, Ábel Molnár, Róbert Kun, Zsolt Molnár |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 3 | 38% |
| Unknown | 5 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 108 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 28 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 20 | 18% |
| Unknown | 26 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 31 | 27% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 20% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 7% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 6 | 5% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Unknown | 30 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2015.
All research outputs
#5,565,963
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#836
of 2,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,570
of 279,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#12
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,647 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,125 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.