↓ Skip to main content

From comte to carnap. marcel bolland the introduction of the vienna circle in france

Overview of attention for article published in Revue de Synthèse, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
From comte to carnap. marcel bolland the introduction of the vienna circle in france
Published in
Revue de Synthèse, June 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11873-014-0260-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter Schöttler

Abstract

The issue of the introduction of viennese "scientific philosophy" in France appears to be resolved. However, the rediscovery of the positivist physicist Marcel Boll (1886-1971), who was the first-well before Louis Rougier-to draw the French public's attention to the works of Schlick, Frank, and Carnap, obliges us to rethink the passage from traditional positivism to neo-positivism during the 1920s and 1930s. The French reception of the Vienna circle can be dated earlier than accepted and is more profound than usualy assumed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 25%
Other 1 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 13%
Lecturer 1 13%
Student > Master 1 13%
Other 1 13%
Unknown 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 3 38%
Arts and Humanities 1 13%
Philosophy 1 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2023.
All research outputs
#7,065,771
of 24,571,708 outputs
Outputs from Revue de Synthèse
#15
of 84 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,263
of 268,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revue de Synthèse
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,571,708 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 84 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,056 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them