↓ Skip to main content

The informational entropy endowed in cortical oscillations

Overview of attention for article published in Cognitive Neurodynamics, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
The informational entropy endowed in cortical oscillations
Published in
Cognitive Neurodynamics, June 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11571-018-9491-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arturo Tozzi, James F. Peters, Mehmet Niyazi Çankaya

Abstract

A two-dimensional shadow may encompass more information than its corresponding three-dimensional object. Indeed, if we rotate the object, we achieve a pool of observed shadows from different angulations, gradients, shapes and variable length contours that make it possible for us to increase our available information. Starting from this simple observation, we show how informational entropies might turn out to be useful in the evaluation of scale-free dynamics in the brain. Indeed, brain activity exhibits a scale-free distribution that leads to the variations in the power law exponent typical of different functional neurophysiological states. Here we show that modifications in scaling slope are associated with variations in Rényi entropy, a generalization of Shannon informational entropy. From a three-dimensional object's perspective, by changing its orientation (standing for the cortical scale-free exponent), we detect different two-dimensional shadows from different perception angles (standing for Rényi entropy in different brain areas). We show how, starting from known values of Rényi entropy (easily detectable in brain fMRIs or EEG traces), it is feasible to calculate the scaling slope in a given moment and in a given brain area. Because changes in scale-free cortical dynamics modify brain activity, this issue points towards novel approaches to mind reading and description of the forces required for transcranial stimulation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 29%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 14%
Student > Postgraduate 2 14%
Student > Bachelor 2 14%
Other 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 7 50%
Mathematics 1 7%
Arts and Humanities 1 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2022.
All research outputs
#18,595,809
of 23,033,713 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive Neurodynamics
#193
of 321 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#252,892
of 327,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive Neurodynamics
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,033,713 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 321 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,992 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.