↓ Skip to main content

Early second-trimester plasma protein profiling using multiplexed isobaric tandem mass tag (TMT) labeling predicts gestational diabetes mellitus

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Diabetologica, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Early second-trimester plasma protein profiling using multiplexed isobaric tandem mass tag (TMT) labeling predicts gestational diabetes mellitus
Published in
Acta Diabetologica, August 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00592-015-0796-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chun Zhao, Fuqiang Wang, Ping Wang, Hongjuan Ding, Xiaoyan Huang, Zhonghua Shi

Abstract

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is associated with an increased risk of serious complications for mother and child during pregnancy. The main option for diagnosis of GDM is 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) at 24-28 gestation weeks, when harms to both mother and child have already potentially occurred. The aim of this study was to investigate new biomarkers for earlier detection and assessment of GDM at early second trimester (16-18 gestation weeks). We systematically used multiplexed isobaric tandem mass tag labeling combined with liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) to screen differentially expressed proteins in plasma collected at 16-18 gestational weeks between pregnant women with and without GDM outcome. A total of 828 proteins were identified, of which 36 proteins implicated in immune response, inflammation, transport, platelet aggregation, catalyze and defense response were identified as differentially regulated proteins in GDM. To assess the validity of the results, four selected proteins including C-reactive protein, sex hormone-binding globulin, Ficolin 3 and pregnancy-specific beta-1-glycoprotein 4 were selected for subsequent Western blot analysis. This is the first comprehensive study that integrates multiple state-of-the-art proteomic technologies to discover the earlier potential plasma biomarkers for GDM.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 24%
Student > Bachelor 7 17%
Student > Master 6 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Professor 2 5%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 7 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 12%
Unspecified 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 10 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 2015.
All research outputs
#19,015,492
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Acta Diabetologica
#673
of 952 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,159
of 265,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Diabetologica
#8
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 952 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,746 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.