Title |
Pongamia pinnata: An Untapped Resource for the Biofuels Industry of the Future
|
---|---|
Published in |
BioEnergy Research, February 2008
|
DOI | 10.1007/s12155-008-9003-0 |
Authors |
Paul T. Scott, Lisette Pregelj, Ning Chen, Johanna S. Hadler, Michael A. Djordjevic, Peter M. Gresshoff |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
India | 3 | 2% |
Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
Chile | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 167 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 20% |
Researcher | 19 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 18 | 10% |
Student > Master | 14 | 8% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 10 | 6% |
Other | 31 | 18% |
Unknown | 46 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 44 | 25% |
Engineering | 29 | 17% |
Environmental Science | 15 | 9% |
Chemical Engineering | 10 | 6% |
Chemistry | 8 | 5% |
Other | 20 | 12% |
Unknown | 47 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2024.
All research outputs
#3,564,451
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from BioEnergy Research
#16
of 614 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,185
of 163,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioEnergy Research
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 614 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,749 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.