| Title |
“It Was Not My Aim to Sleep There”: The Impact of Timing and Location of Sex on Adherence to Coitally-Dependent HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
AIDS and Behavior, June 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10461-018-2195-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fiona Scorgie, Jonathan Stadler, Deborah Baron, Susan Ju, Tshepiso Ikaneng, Zonke Mabude, Sylvia Makgopa, Matshidiso A. Malefo, Kgahlisho N. Manenzhe, Thulani Mazibuko, Hilda Ntjana, Busi Nkala, Thesla Palanee-Phillips, Glenda Gray, Helen Rees, Sinead Delany-Moretlwe |
| Abstract |
The FACTS 001 trial found that vaginal pre- and post-coital application of 1% tenofovir gel did not prevent HIV-1 infection amongst young South African women. The trial included a multi-faceted approach to adherence support and collected objective and self-reported adherence measures. Using qualitative data collected from a random sub-set of FACTS 001 participants (135 in-depth interviews at product discontinuation and 13 focus group discussions at dissemination of trial results), we explore the importance of 'place' and 'timing' in shaping acts of sexual intimacy and product adherence. Demographically, this qualitative sub-sample is similar to the trial cohort of predominantly young, unemployed women living with parents or other family members. Sexual intimacy was largely unpredictable and happened across multiple locations in which women had limited privacy, autonomy, or control over the timing of sex. This made adherence to the dosing strategy challenging. Findings may inform the development of future event-driven pre-exposure prophylaxis regimens or products. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 67% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 82 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 13% |
| Researcher | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 29 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 16% |
| Psychology | 8 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 12% |
| Unknown | 34 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2020.
All research outputs
#15,915,093
of 24,228,883 outputs
Outputs from AIDS and Behavior
#2,432
of 3,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,862
of 305,863 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AIDS and Behavior
#58
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,228,883 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,613 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,863 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.