↓ Skip to main content

Dosimetry of bone metastases in targeted radionuclide therapy with alpha-emitting 223Ra-dichloride

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
117 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
Title
Dosimetry of bone metastases in targeted radionuclide therapy with alpha-emitting 223Ra-dichloride
Published in
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, August 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00259-015-3150-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Massimiliano Pacilio, Guido Ventroni, Giuseppe De Vincentis, Bartolomeo Cassano, Rosanna Pellegrini, Elisabetta Di Castro, Viviana Frantellizzi, Giulia Anna Follacchio, Tatiana Garkavaya, Leda Lorenzon, Pasquale Ialongo, Roberto Pani, Lucio Mango

Abstract

Ra-dichloride is an alpha-emitting radiopharmaceutical used in the treatment of bone metastases from castration-resistant prostate cancer. Image-based dosimetric studies remain challenging because the emitted photons are few. The aim of this study was to implement a methodology for in-vivo quantitative planar imaging, and to assess the absorbed dose to lesions using the MIRD approach. The study included nine Caucasian patients with 24 lesions (6 humeral head lesions, 4 iliac wing lesions, 2 scapular lesions, 5 trochanter lesions, 3 vertebral lesions, 3 glenoid lesions, 1 coxofemoral lesion). The treatment consisted of six injections (one every 4 weeks) of 50 kBq per kg body weight. Gamma-camera calibrations for (223)Ra included measurements of sensitivity and transmission curves. Patients were statically imaged for 30 min, using an MEGP collimator, double-peak acquisition, and filtering to improve the image quality. Lesions were delineated on (99m)Tc-MDP whole-body images, and the ROIs superimposed on the (223)Ra images after image coregistration. The activity was quantified with background, attenuation, and scatter correction. Absorbed doses were assessed deriving the S values from the S factors for soft-tissue spheres of OLINDA/EXM, evaluating the lesion volumes by delineation on the CT images. In 12 lesions with a wash-in phase the biokinetics were assumed to be biexponential, and to be monoexponential in the remainder. The optimal timing for serial acquisitions was between 1 and 5 h, between 18 and 24 h, between 48 and 60 h, and between 7 and 15 days. The error in cumulated activity neglecting the wash-in phase was between 2 % and 12 %. The mean effective half-life (T 1/2eff) of (223)Ra was 8.2 days (range 5.5-11.4 days). The absorbed dose (D) after the first injection was 0.7 Gy (range 0.2-1.9 Gy. Considering the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of alpha particles (RBE = 5), D RBE = 899 mGy/MBq (range 340-2,450 mGy/MBq). The percent uptake of (99m)Tc and (223)Ra (activity extrapolated to t = 0) were significantly correlated. The feasibility of in vivo quantitative imaging in (223)Ra therapy was confirmed. The lesion uptake of (223)Ra-dichloride was significantly correlated with that of (99m)Tc-MDP. The D RBE to lesions per unit administered activity was much higher than that of other bone-seeking radiopharmaceuticals, but considering a standard administration of 21 MBq (six injections of 50 kBq/kg to a 70-kg patient), the mean cumulative value of D RBE was about 19 Gy, and was therefore in the range of those of other radiopharmaceuticals. The macrodosimetry of bone metastases in treatments with (223)Ra-dichloride is feasible, but more work is needed to demonstrate its helpfulness in predicting clinical outcomes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 1%
Unknown 87 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 16%
Other 12 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 13%
Student > Master 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 22 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 24%
Physics and Astronomy 14 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 8%
Chemistry 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 31 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2015.
All research outputs
#19,214,418
of 23,806,312 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
#2,305
of 3,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,566
of 265,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
#42
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,806,312 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,083 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,698 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.