You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Phytoliths as a tool for investigations of agricultural origins and dispersals around the world
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Archaeological Science, April 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jas.2015.08.010 |
| Authors |
Terry Ball, Karol Chandler-Ezell, Ruth Dickau, Neil Duncan, Thomas C. Hart, Jose Iriarte, Carol Lentfer, Amanda Logan, Houyuan Lu, Marco Madella, Deborah M. Pearsall, Dolores R. Piperno, Arlene M. Rosen, Luc Vrydaghs, Alison Weisskopf, Jianping Zhang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 194 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| Colombia | 2 | 1% |
| Estonia | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 188 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 34 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 30 | 15% |
| Unknown | 43 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Arts and Humanities | 42 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 27 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 25 | 13% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 15 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 22 | 11% |
| Unknown | 50 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2016.
All research outputs
#4,618,763
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Archaeological Science
#853
of 2,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,421
of 314,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Archaeological Science
#8
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,997 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,718 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.