↓ Skip to main content

The Australia clause and REDD: a cautionary tale

Overview of attention for article published in Climatic Change, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
12 news outlets
blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Title
The Australia clause and REDD: a cautionary tale
Published in
Climatic Change, August 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10584-011-0210-x
Authors

Andrew Macintosh

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 4%
United States 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 43 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 21%
Researcher 9 19%
Student > Master 7 15%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Professor 2 4%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 8 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 16 34%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 11%
Social Sciences 5 11%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 4%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 8 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 106. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2021.
All research outputs
#331,567
of 22,821,814 outputs
Outputs from Climatic Change
#169
of 5,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,204
of 124,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climatic Change
#8
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,821,814 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,811 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,073 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.