↓ Skip to main content

Laparoscopic repair is superior to open techniques when treating primary groin hernias in women: a nationwide register-based cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Endoscopy, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
32 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
Laparoscopic repair is superior to open techniques when treating primary groin hernias in women: a nationwide register-based cohort study
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy, June 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00464-018-6270-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Line Schmidt, Stina Öberg, Kristoffer Andresen, Jacob Rosenberg

Abstract

Few studies have described recurrence rates after groin hernia repair in women. Our aim was to investigate if laparoscopic repair of primary groin hernias in women results in a lower reoperation rate for recurrence compared with open repairs. Furthermore, we wished to compare hernia subtypes at primary repair and reoperation. This nationwide cohort study was reported according to the RECORD statement. We used prospectively collected data from the Danish Hernia Database to generate a cohort of females operated for a primary groin hernia from 1998 to 2017. Our primary outcome was reoperation for recurrence. The secondary outcome was subtype of hernia at primary repair and reoperation. All females had at least 6-month follow-up. We included 13,945 primary groin hernia operations in women, of whom 649 had undergone a reoperation for recurrence. Median follow-up time was 8.8 years. The cumulative reoperation rates were lower after laparoscopic repair compared with the open techniques, for both inguinal hernias (1.8 vs. 6.3%, p < 0.001) and femoral hernias (2.2 vs. 5.5%, p = 0.005). After laparoscopic repair, 25% of inguinal hernias recurred as femoral, compared with 47% after Lichtenstein (p < 0.001). Direct inguinal hernias and femoral hernias had higher risk of reoperation for recurrence after open repair compared with indirect inguinal hernias. For laparoscopic procedures, hernia subtypes at the primary groin hernia repair had similar reoperation rates. Laparoscopic repair of primary groin hernia in women had lower reoperation rates and fewer femoral recurrences than open repair techniques.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Researcher 3 8%
Other 9 23%
Unknown 13 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 51%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Sports and Recreations 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 14 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2019.
All research outputs
#1,537,455
of 23,090,520 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#125
of 6,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,064
of 328,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#5
of 138 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,090,520 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,123 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,721 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 138 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.