| Title |
Chimpanzees demonstrate individual differences in social information use
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Animal Cognition, June 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10071-018-1198-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stuart K. Watson, Gillian L. Vale, Lydia M. Hopper, Lewis G. Dean, Rachel L. Kendal, Elizabeth E. Price, Lara A. Wood, Sarah J. Davis, Steven J. Schapiro, Susan P. Lambeth, Andrew Whiten |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 76 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 26 | 34% |
| United States | 6 | 8% |
| Spain | 3 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 3 | 4% |
| Germany | 2 | 3% |
| Austria | 2 | 3% |
| Hong Kong | 2 | 3% |
| Poland | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 28 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 42 | 55% |
| Scientists | 26 | 34% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 89 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 31% |
| Researcher | 13 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 15 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 31 | 35% |
| Psychology | 23 | 26% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 2% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 22 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2018.
All research outputs
#965,595
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Animal Cognition
#226
of 1,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,581
of 344,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Cognition
#1
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,587 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,240 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.