↓ Skip to main content

PSP-Phenotype in SCA8: Case Report and Systemic Review

Overview of attention for article published in The Cerebellum, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
PSP-Phenotype in SCA8: Case Report and Systemic Review
Published in
The Cerebellum, June 2018
DOI 10.1007/s12311-018-0955-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Makoto Samukawa, Makito Hirano, Kazumasa Saigoh, Shigeru Kawai, Yukihiro Hamada, Daisuke Takahashi, Yusaku Nakamura, Susumu Kusunoki

Abstract

Spinocerebellar ataxia type 8 (SCA8) is a rare autosomal dominant neurodegenerative disease caused by expanded CTA/CTG repeats in the ATXN8OS gene. Many patients had pure cerebellar ataxia, while some had parkinsonism, both without causal explanation. We analyzed the ATXN8OS gene in 150 Japanese patients with ataxia and 76 patients with Parkinson's disease or related disorders. We systematically reassessed 123 patients with SCA8, both our patients and those reported in other studies. Two patients with progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) had mutations in the ATXN8OS gene. Systematic analyses revealed that patients with parkinsonism had significantly shorter CTA/CTG repeat expansions and older age at onset than those with predominant ataxia. We show the imaging results of patients with and without parkinsonism. We also found a significant inverse relationship between repeat sizes and age at onset in all patients, which has not been detected previously. Our results may be useful to genetic counseling, improve understanding of the pathomechanism, and extend the clinical phenotype of SCA8.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 22%
Student > Bachelor 6 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Researcher 2 7%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 4 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 30%
Neuroscience 4 15%
Psychology 2 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 7 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2018.
All research outputs
#16,272,032
of 23,975,976 outputs
Outputs from The Cerebellum
#491
of 957 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#212,722
of 331,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Cerebellum
#6
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,975,976 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 957 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,507 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.