You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Novel Common Genetic Susceptibility Loci for Colorectal Cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, June 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1093/jnci/djy099 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stephanie L Schmit, Christopher K Edlund, Fredrick R Schumacher, Jian Gong, Tabitha A Harrison, Jeroen R Huyghe, Chenxu Qu, Marilena Melas, David J Van Den Berg, Hansong Wang, Stephanie Tring, Sarah J Plummer, Demetrius Albanes, M Henar Alonso, Christopher I Amos, Kristen Anton, Aaron K Aragaki, Volker Arndt, Elizabeth L Barry, Sonja I Berndt, Stéphane Bezieau, Stephanie Bien, Amanda Bloomer, Juergen Boehm, Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault, Hermann Brenner, Stefanie Brezina, Daniel D Buchanan, Katja Butterbach, Bette J Caan, Peter T Campbell, Christopher S Carlson, Jose E Castelao, Andrew T Chan, Jenny Chang-Claude, Stephen J Chanock, Iona Cheng, Ya-Wen Cheng, Lee Soo Chin, James M Church, Timothy Church, Gerhard A Coetzee, Michelle Cotterchio, Marcia Cruz Correa, Keith R Curtis, David Duggan, Douglas F Easton, Dallas English, Edith J M Feskens, Rocky Fischer, Liesel M FitzGerald, Barbara K Fortini, Lars G Fritsche, Charles S Fuchs, Manuela Gago-Dominguez, Manish Gala, Steven J Gallinger, W James Gauderman, Graham G Giles, Edward L Giovannucci, Stephanie M Gogarten, Clicerio Gonzalez-Villalpando, Elena M Gonzalez-Villalpando, William M Grady, Joel K Greenson, Andrea Gsur, Marc Gunter, Christopher A Haiman, Jochen Hampe, Sophia Harlid, John F Harju, Richard B Hayes, Philipp Hofer, Michael Hoffmeister, John L Hopper, Shu-Chen Huang, Jose Maria Huerta, Thomas J Hudson, David J Hunter, Gregory E Idos, Motoki Iwasaki, Rebecca D Jackson, Eric J Jacobs, Sun Ha Jee, Mark A Jenkins, Wei-Hua Jia, Shuo Jiao, Amit D Joshi, Laurence N Kolonel, Suminori Kono, Charles Kooperberg, Vittorio Krogh, Tilman Kuehn, Sébastien Küry, Andrea LaCroix, Cecelia A Laurie, Flavio Lejbkowicz, Mathieu Lemire, Heinz-Josef Lenz, David Levine, Christopher I Li, Li Li, Wolfgang Lieb, Yi Lin, Noralane M Lindor, Yun-Ru Liu, Fotios Loupakis, Yingchang Lu, Frank Luh, Jing Ma, Christoph Mancao, Frank J Manion, Sanford D Markowitz, Vicente Martin, Koichi Matsuda, Keitaro Matsuo, Kevin J McDonnell, Caroline E McNeil, Roger Milne, Antonio J Molina, Bhramar Mukherjee, Neil Murphy, Polly A Newcomb, Kenneth Offit, Hanane Omichessan, Domenico Palli, Jesus P Paredes Cotoré, Julyann Pérez-Mayoral, Paul D Pharoah, John D Potter, Conghui Qu, Leon Raskin, Gad Rennert, Hedy S Rennert, Bridget M Riggs, Clemens Schafmayer, Robert E Schoen, Thomas A Sellers, Daniela Seminara, Gianluca Severi, Wei Shi, David Shibata, Xiao-Ou Shu, Erin M Siegel, Martha L Slattery, Melissa Southey, Zsofia K Stadler, Mariana C Stern, Sebastian Stintzing, Darin Taverna, Stephen N Thibodeau, Duncan C Thomas, Antonia Trichopoulou, Shoichiro Tsugane, Cornelia M Ulrich, Franzel J B van Duijnhoven, Bethany van Guelpan, Joseph Vijai, Jarmo Virtamo, Stephanie J Weinstein, Emily White, Aung Ko Win, Alicja Wolk, Michael Woods, Anna H Wu, Kana Wu, Yong-Bing Xiang, Yun Yen, Brent W Zanke, Yi-Xin Zeng, Ben Zhang, Niha Zubair, Sun-Seog Kweon, Jane C Figueiredo, Wei Zheng, Loic Le Marchand, Annika Lindblom, Victor Moreno, Ulrike Peters, Graham Casey, Li Hsu, David V Conti, Stephen B Gruber |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 45% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 15% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 5 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 70% |
| Scientists | 4 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 212 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 212 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 32 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 8% |
| Professor | 15 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 36 | 17% |
| Unknown | 78 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 32 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 24 | 11% |
| Unknown | 96 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2020.
All research outputs
#1,818,413
of 25,746,891 outputs
Outputs from JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
#1,167
of 7,882 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,630
of 329,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
#18
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,746,891 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,882 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,695 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.