↓ Skip to main content

In Silico Analysis for Five Major Cereal Crops Phytocystatins

Overview of attention for article published in Interdisciplinary Sciences: Computational Life Sciences, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
In Silico Analysis for Five Major Cereal Crops Phytocystatins
Published in
Interdisciplinary Sciences: Computational Life Sciences, August 2015
DOI 10.1007/s12539-015-0264-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rupal Chauhan, Yogesh Jasrai, Himanshu Pandya

Abstract

Five major cereal crops such as rice, wheat, maize, barley and sorghum are continuously threatened by a multitude of pathogens and other disorders. Cystatins offers a pivotal role in deciding the promising plant response. The use of bioinformatics tools for phylogenetic relationships of five major cereal crop (rice, wheat, maize, barley and sorghum) phytocystatins based on amino acid sequence information was elucidated, and their secondary and tertiary structures were investigated for structural comparisons. Twenty-eight distinct phytocystatins from 28 plant species were investigated. Phytocystatins could be divided into five distinct phylogenetic groups. Five major cereal crops their structural features were highly conserved, and their amino acid sequence similarities ranged from 48 to 86 %. A new highly conserved amino acid sequence motif, YEAKxWxKxF, in the C-terminal end being unique to phytocystatins was identified. The predicted 3D homology models showed a high conservation of the general central structure of the phytocystatins, i.e., the 4-5 anti-parallel [Formula: see text]-sheets, wrapping halfway round a single central [Formula: see text]-helix and particularly the three active site regions, the N-terminal, the first and second hairpin loops. Any structural differences seem to be mainly in the length of the N- and C-terminal, the length of the second hairpin loop and the fifth [Formula: see text]-sheet. Via docking experiments, small heterogeneities were observed in the vicinity of the OC-I active sites that seemed to be influential in the binding process and stability of the resultant inhibitor-protease complex.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 19%
Researcher 3 19%
Student > Master 3 19%
Professor 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 4 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 13%
Engineering 2 13%
Social Sciences 2 13%
Computer Science 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 5 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2017.
All research outputs
#18,422,065
of 22,821,814 outputs
Outputs from Interdisciplinary Sciences: Computational Life Sciences
#165
of 294 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#190,405
of 264,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Interdisciplinary Sciences: Computational Life Sciences
#12
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,821,814 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 294 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,389 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.