↓ Skip to main content

Discovery of new feline paramyxoviruses in domestic cats with chronic kidney disease

Overview of attention for article published in Virus Genes, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#25 of 1,050)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
4 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Discovery of new feline paramyxoviruses in domestic cats with chronic kidney disease
Published in
Virus Genes, August 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11262-015-1232-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Sieg, Kristin Heenemann, Antje Rückner, Iwan Burgener, Gerhard Oechtering, Thomas W. Vahlenkamp

Abstract

Paramyxoviruses constitute a large family of enveloped RNA viruses including important pathogens in veterinary and human medicine. Recently, feline paramyxoviruses, genus morbillivirus, were detected in cats from Hong Kong and Japan. Here we describe the discovery of several new feline paramyxoviruses. Infections with these diverse viruses were detected in urine samples from cats suffering from chronic kidney disease (CKD). No viral RNA was found in cats without clinical signs of uropathy highlighting an association between feline paramyxovirus (FPaV) infections and CKD. Phylogenetic analyses of the detected viruses showed that they represent at least two different species, one of them representing the feline morbilliviruses detected previously in Hong Kong and Japan. In addition, a new FPaV was detected sharing only 73 % homology on the nucleotide level of the viral L-gene to currently known paramyxoviral species.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 2%
Unknown 40 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 15%
Student > Bachelor 6 15%
Researcher 5 12%
Other 5 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 9 22%
Unknown 8 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 16 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 9 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2021.
All research outputs
#2,961,318
of 24,679,965 outputs
Outputs from Virus Genes
#25
of 1,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,077
of 269,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Virus Genes
#1
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,679,965 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,050 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,652 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.