You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Prescription contraception use: a cross-sectional population study of psychosocial determinants
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMJ Open, August 2015
|
DOI | 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007794 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Gerard J Molloy, Leigh-Ann Sweeney, Molly Byrne, Carmel M Hughes, Roger Ingham, Karen Morgan, Andrew W Murphy |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Rwanda | 1 | 11% |
United States | 1 | 11% |
France | 1 | 11% |
Montenegro | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 5 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 56% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 22% |
Scientists | 1 | 11% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 64 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 11 | 17% |
Researcher | 9 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 11% |
Other | 6 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 9% |
Other | 10 | 16% |
Unknown | 15 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 30% |
Social Sciences | 8 | 13% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 11% |
Psychology | 6 | 9% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 5% |
Other | 6 | 9% |
Unknown | 15 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2016.
All research outputs
#7,238,286
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#11,618
of 25,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,450
of 279,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#146
of 282 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,933 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,752 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 282 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.