↓ Skip to main content

Interpretation of Indications Generated by Small Welding Discontinuities in Ultrasonic Time of Flight Diffraction Technique

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Interpretation of Indications Generated by Small Welding Discontinuities in Ultrasonic Time of Flight Diffraction Technique
Published in
Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation, June 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10921-018-0504-2
Authors

K. Kaczmarek, R. Kaczmarek, J. Słania

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 40%
Student > Bachelor 2 40%
Unknown 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 4 80%
Unknown 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2018.
All research outputs
#15,536,861
of 23,090,520 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation
#112
of 242 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,380
of 328,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation
#3
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,090,520 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 242 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,030 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.