You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
ロールプレイを活性化する触媒としての人形劇 : 多様な視点からの洞察を促すための対面協調学習環境(情報化社会におけるインフォーマルラーニング)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Japan Journal of Educational Technology, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.15077/jjet.kj00008987692 |
| Authors |
望月 俊男, 佐々木 博史, 脇本 健弘, 平山 涼也, 久保田 善彦, 鈴木 栄幸 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 3 | 50% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2019.
All research outputs
#8,190,103
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Japan Journal of Educational Technology
#56
of 380 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,119
of 226,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japan Journal of Educational Technology
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 380 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,667 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.