↓ Skip to main content

The Relational and Bodily Experiences Theory of Sexual Desire in Women

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Sexual Behavior, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
22 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
123 Mendeley
Title
The Relational and Bodily Experiences Theory of Sexual Desire in Women
Published in
Archives of Sexual Behavior, June 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10508-018-1212-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eugenia Cherkasskaya, Margaret Rosario

Abstract

We review the theory and research on women's sexual desire and present a theory that incorporates internalized representations of relational and bodily experiences into our understanding of the full range of desire in women. To this end, we move away from the current tendency to focus on low sexual desire in women and instead consider desire on a spectrum or continuum from absent or diminished to high desire across multiple sexual orientations, including heterosexual, bisexual, and lesbian. We review definitions of sexual desire, as well as the epidemiology and etiology of hypoactive sexual desire, the most prevalent sexual complaint in women, including the biological, psychological, and relationship correlates of inhibited sexual desire. Subsequently, we examine the research on highly sexual women, who tend to experience high levels of sexual desire, sexual agency, and sexual esteem, and distinguish between high sexual desire and hypersexuality. We introduce two important constructs that are integrated into the Relational and Bodily Experiences Theory (RBET) of sexual desire in women: attachment and sexual body self-representations, suggesting that women's internalized representations of self and other that stem from childhood and their capacity to embody their sexual bodies are integral to our understanding of the phenomenology of sexual desire in women. RBET calls for further research into the links between attachment, sexual body self-representations, and desire, and suggests that clinical interventions for sexual desire difficulties in women should emphasize internalized working models of relationships (i.e., attachment) and integrate bodily based approaches.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 123 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 17 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 13%
Student > Master 16 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 9%
Researcher 8 7%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 41 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 45 37%
Social Sciences 11 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Arts and Humanities 2 2%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 47 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 190. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2023.
All research outputs
#190,633
of 23,859,750 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#125
of 3,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,473
of 331,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#3
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,859,750 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,559 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,222 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.