You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Tackling frailty and functional decline: Background of the action group A3 of the European innovation partnership for active and healthy ageing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Maturitas, June 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.maturitas.2018.06.009 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Antonio Cano, Guy Dargent, Ana Carriazo, Luz López-Samaniego, Joao Apostolo, Elzbieta Campos, Carol Holland, Isabel Varela-Nieto, M. Luz Sánchez-Sánchez, Maddalena Illario, Guido Iaccarino, Regina E. Roller, Edwig Goossens, Miriam Vollenbroek-Hutten, Sandra Pais, Federico Schena, Daniele Musian, Serena Alvino, Marcello Maggio, Giuseppe Liotta, Silvia Ussai, Francisco Orfila, Ronan O’Caoimh, Costança Paul, Stefania Pazzi, Valeria Romano, Paola Obbia |
| Abstract |
Ageing populations represent a challenge to the sustainability of current healthcare systems. The need to balance these demographic changes with gains in healthy life years and quality of life (QoL) constitutes an additional challenge. Aware of this, the European Commission (EC) launched the European Innovation Partnership on Active and Healthy Ageing (EIPonAHA) in 2012. The EIPonAHA is an interdisciplinary and cross-sector initiative involving more than 3000 partners with two specific objectives: to increase the healthy life expectancy of Europeans by two years by 2020, while increasing their QoL. The initiatives of the EIPonAHA have been organized according to six thematic action groups (AGs), with the A3 group targeting areas relating to the prevention of functional decline and frailty. In addition to the good practices of partners, there are several on-going collaborative works. The involvement of the EC includes support through an elaborated research programme in which the Consumers, Health, Agriculture and Food Executive Agency (CHAFEA) and the Directorate-General for Communications Networks, Content and Technology (DG CONNECT) are the main funding bodies. Screening approaches and preventive interventions constitute most of the initiatives within the A3 AG. Partners are distributed across five sub-groups according to good practices: i) cognitive decline, ii) food and nutrition, iii) physical activity, iv) caregivers, and v) frailty and functional decline. Regular updates of the progression of both good practices and collaborative works are presented in A3 AG meetings. The 2017 meeting in Valencia, Spain, showcased in this paper, provides an up-to-date overview of the current status of A3 activities. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 92 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 18 | 20% |
| Unknown | 28 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 4% |
| Engineering | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 16% |
| Unknown | 39 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2018.
All research outputs
#17,302,400
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Maturitas
#2,147
of 2,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,554
of 341,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Maturitas
#36
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,811 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,606 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.