| Title |
Synthesis and application of magnetic molecularly imprinted polymers in sample preparation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, April 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00216-018-1013-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shuyao Huang, Jianqiao Xu, Jiating Zheng, Fang Zhu, Lijun Xie, Gangfeng Ouyang |
| Abstract |
Magnetic molecularly imprinted polymers (MMIPs) have superior advantages in sample pretreatment because of their high selectivity for target analytes and the fast and easy isolation from samples. To meet the demand of both good magnetic property and good extraction performance, MMIPs with various structures, from traditional core-shell structures to novel composite structures with a larger specific surface area and more accessible binding sites, are fabricated by different preparation technologies. Moreover, as the molecularly imprinted polymer (MIP) layers determine the affinity, selectivity, and saturated adsorption amount of MMIPs, the development and innovation of the MIP layer are attracting attention and are reviewed here. Many studies that used MMIPs as sorbents in dispersive solid-phase extraction of complex samples, including environmental, food, and biofluid samples, are summarized. Graphical abstract The application of magnetic molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs) in the sample preparation procedure improves the analytical performances for complex samples. MITs molecular imprinting technologies. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 96 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 16 | 17% |
| Researcher | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 5% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Unknown | 41 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 29 | 30% |
| Engineering | 5 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 4% |
| Materials Science | 4 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 47 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2018.
All research outputs
#22,835,295
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#7,569
of 9,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#303,365
of 343,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#129
of 175 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,646 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,578 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 175 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.