↓ Skip to main content

Precision Neuro-oncology: the Role of Genomic Testing in the Management of Adult and Pediatric Gliomas

Overview of attention for article published in Current Treatment Options in Oncology, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
Precision Neuro-oncology: the Role of Genomic Testing in the Management of Adult and Pediatric Gliomas
Published in
Current Treatment Options in Oncology, June 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11864-018-0559-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lori A. Ramkissoon, Nicholas Britt, Alexander Guevara, Emily Whitt, Eric Severson, Pratheesh Sathyan, Laurie Gay, Julia Elvin, Jeffrey S. Ross, Charlotte Brown, Kimberly Stogner-Underwood, Ryan Mott, David Kram, Roy Strowd, Glenn J. Lesser, Shakti H. Ramkissoon

Abstract

In recent years, large-scale genomic studies have expanded our knowledge regarding genomic drivers in tumors of the central nervous system. While histopathologic analysis of brain tumors remains the primary method for tumor classification, the clinical utility of molecular and genomic testing to support and/or complement tumor classification continues to expand. This approach enhances diagnostic accuracy and provides clinicians with objective data to facilitate discussions regarding prognosis and treatment decisions, including selection of clinical trials. Ensuring accurate diagnoses is fundamental to the management of brain tumor patients. However, given the morphologic overlap among primary brain tumors, genomic data can be used to help distinguish tumor lineage. In its clearest form, we have embraced the concept of an integrated diagnosis, which combines traditional histopathology findings with molecular and genomic data. Patient prognosis varies significantly based on a tumor's genomic profile. For neuro-oncology patients, outcome studies linking diagnoses with genomic profiles show significant differences based on tumor biomarkers such as IDH1/2, H3F3A, BRAF, and CDKN2A and TERT status. Therefore, easy access to reliable genomic data is important in understanding a patient's disease and developing a clinical strategy wherein targeted molecular or immune therapies can be incorporated into the discussion.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 18%
Researcher 5 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Student > Postgraduate 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 11 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 31%
Neuroscience 3 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 12 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2018.
All research outputs
#15,536,861
of 23,090,520 outputs
Outputs from Current Treatment Options in Oncology
#394
of 677 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,402
of 328,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Treatment Options in Oncology
#7
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,090,520 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 677 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,076 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.