↓ Skip to main content

Is mental effort exertion contagious?

Overview of attention for article published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
29 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
twitter
84 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
Title
Is mental effort exertion contagious?
Published in
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, August 2015
DOI 10.3758/s13423-015-0923-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kobe Desender, Sarah Beurms, Eva Van den Bussche

Abstract

The presence of another person can influence task performance. What is, however, still unclear is whether performance also depends on what this other person is doing. In two experiments, two participants (A and B) jointly performed a Simon task, and we selectively manipulated the difficulty of the task for participant A only. This was achieved by presenting A with 90% congruent trials (creating an easy task requiring low effort investment) or 10% congruent trials (creating a difficult task requiring high effort investment). Although this manipulation is irrelevant for the task of participant B, we nevertheless observed that B exerted more mental effort when participant A performed the difficult version of the task, compared to the easy version. Crucially, in Experiment 2 this was found to be the case even when participants could not see each other's stimuli. These results provide a first compelling demonstration that the exertion of effort is contagious.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 84 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 2%
Luxembourg 1 2%
Unknown 60 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 23%
Student > Master 8 13%
Other 7 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 10%
Researcher 5 8%
Other 11 18%
Unknown 11 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 31 50%
Social Sciences 4 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 5%
Computer Science 3 5%
Mathematics 1 2%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 15 24%