↓ Skip to main content

A Distinct Region in Erythropoietin that Induces Immuno/Inflammatory Modulation and Tissue Protection

Overview of attention for article published in Neurotherapeutics, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
A Distinct Region in Erythropoietin that Induces Immuno/Inflammatory Modulation and Tissue Protection
Published in
Neurotherapeutics, October 2015
DOI 10.1007/s13311-015-0379-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

RuiRong Yuan, Bo Wang, Wei Lu, Yasuhiro Maeda, Peter Dowling

Abstract

Beneficial effects of short-term whole-molecule erythropoietin (EPO) therapy have been demonstrated on several animal models of diverse central nervous system pathology. However, the increased hematocrit induced by EPO-driven marrow stimulation greatly limits its potential for side effect-free therapy. We created a library of EPO-derived fragments based on the hypothesis that 2 distinct functions, erythropoiesis and tissue protection, reside in different regions of the molecule. Several small EPO-derived peptides within the Aβ loop of whole EPO molecule were screened for tissue protection in EAE mice. The 19-mer JM-4 peptide that contains 2 cysteine molecules consistently demonstrated the most potent clinical beneficial effects without producing hematocrit alterations in animal models of EAE. The JM-4-induced tissue protection was associated with modulation of the immunoregulatory process that drives inflammation and provokes subsequent autoimmune damage. Like the whole EPO molecule, JM-4 effectively modulated immune/inflammatory reaction within both the peripheral lymphatic tissue and central nervous system. The major effects induced by JM-4 include blocked expansion of monocyte/dendritic antigen presenting cell and T helper 17 cell populations, decreased proinflammatory cytokine production, and sharply enhanced expansion of the regulatory T-cell population. JM-4 shows promise for treatment of a broad spectrum of neural and non-neural conditions associated with inflammation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 3%
Unknown 38 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 21%
Student > Bachelor 6 15%
Researcher 4 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 10 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 10%
Psychology 3 8%
Neuroscience 3 8%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 9 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2017.
All research outputs
#7,355,485
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Neurotherapeutics
#698
of 1,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,053
of 286,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurotherapeutics
#14
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,308 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,876 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.