↓ Skip to main content

Deaths from acute abdominal conditions and geographical access to surgical care in India: a nationally representative spatial analysis

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet Global Health, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
31 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
149 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Deaths from acute abdominal conditions and geographical access to surgical care in India: a nationally representative spatial analysis
Published in
The Lancet Global Health, August 2015
DOI 10.1016/s2214-109x(15)00079-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna J Dare, Joshua S Ng-Kamstra, Jayadeep Patra, Sze Hang Fu, Peter S Rodriguez, Marvin Hsiao, Raju M Jotkar, J S Thakur, Jay Sheth, Prabhat Jha, Million Death Study Collaborators

Abstract

Few population-based studies quantify mortality from surgical conditions and relate mortality to access to surgical care in low-income and middle-income countries. We linked deaths from acute abdominal conditions within a nationally representative, population-based mortality survey of 1·1 million households in India to nationally representative facility data. We calculated total and age-standardised death rates for acute abdominal conditions. Using 4064 postal codes, we undertook a spatial clustering analysis to compare geographical access to well-resourced government district hospitals (24 h surgical and anaesthesia services, blood bank, critical care beds, basic laboratory, and radiology) in high-mortality or low-mortality clusters from acute abdominal conditions. 923 (1·1%) of 86 806 study deaths at ages 0-69 years were identified as deaths from acute abdominal conditions, corresponding to 72 000 deaths nationally in 2010 in India. Most deaths occurred at home (71%) and in rural areas (87%). Compared with 567 low-mortality geographical clusters, the 393 high-mortality clusters had a nine times higher age-standardised acute abdominal mortality rate and significantly greater distance to a well-resourced hospital. The odds ratio (OR) of being a high-mortality cluster was 4·4 (99% CI 3·2-6·0) for living 50 km or more from well-resourced district hospitals (rising to an OR of 16·1 [95% CI 7·9-32·8] for >100 km). No such relation was seen for deaths from non-acute surgical conditions (ie, oral, breast, and uterine cancer). Improvements in human and physical resources at existing government hospitals are needed to reduce deaths from acute abdominal conditions in India. Full access to well-resourced hospitals within 50 km by all of India's population could have avoided about 50 000 deaths from acute abdominal conditions, and probably more from other emergency surgical conditions. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Canadian Institute of Health Research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 2 1%
United States 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Unknown 144 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 17%
Student > Master 25 17%
Student > Postgraduate 16 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Other 36 24%
Unknown 26 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 76 51%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 7%
Social Sciences 9 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Unspecified 3 2%
Other 18 12%
Unknown 30 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,510,289
of 25,711,194 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet Global Health
#1,165
of 3,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,004
of 276,874 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet Global Health
#18
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,194 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,218 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 61.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,874 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.