↓ Skip to main content

Long-term Consequences of Noninjurious and Injurious Falls on Well-being in Older Women

Overview of attention for article published in Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences & Medical Sciences, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Long-term Consequences of Noninjurious and Injurious Falls on Well-being in Older Women
Published in
Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences & Medical Sciences, August 2015
DOI 10.1093/gerona/glv102
Pubmed ID
Authors

G M E E Geeske Peeters, Mark Jones, Julie Byles, Annette J Dobson

Abstract

The physical and mental health consequences of falls are known to influence well-being in the short term. The aim was to investigate the long-term consequences of noninjurious and injurious falls on well-being in older women over 12 years. A total of 10,277 participants (aged 73-78 years, 98.8% community-dwelling) returned the 1999 survey of the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health. Follow-up surveys were completed at 3-year intervals. Surveys included questions about falls and related injuries in the past year. Scores on the health-related quality of life Short Form-36 subscales (range 0-100) were used to compare well-being between noninjurious fallers, injurious fallers, and nonfallers using linear mixed modeling with adjustment for confounders. Scores in the years before and after the first fall since enrolment were graphically depicted with time relative to the first fall since enrolment. For this purpose, nonfallers were matched with noninjurious and injurious fallers based on pattern of surveys returned, chronic conditions, and age to assign them a fictitious "time-of-first-fall." Over 12 years, there were 22.5% noninjurious fallers, 30.1% injurious fallers, and 47.5% nonfallers. Compared with nonfallers, noninjurious and injurious fallers scored significantly lower on six and seven of the eight domains at the time of the reported fall, respectively. Significant differences were apparent 12 years before the injurious fall for the subscales role physical, bodily pain, and general health. A drop in scores after the reported injurious fall was seen for role physical, bodily pain, and social functioning. Among older women, a gap in well-being emerges years before the first reported fall, which may be driven by underlying risk factors rather than the fall itself.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 59 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 16%
Researcher 8 13%
Student > Master 8 13%
Student > Postgraduate 7 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Other 15 24%
Unknown 10 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 19%
Sports and Recreations 6 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 14 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2019.
All research outputs
#7,060,650
of 25,411,814 outputs
Outputs from Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences & Medical Sciences
#1,876
of 3,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,395
of 276,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences & Medical Sciences
#32
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,411,814 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,974 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,223 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.