↓ Skip to main content

The Intergenerational Transmission of Low Birth Weight and Intrauterine Growth Restriction: A Large Cross-generational Cohort Study in Taiwan

Overview of attention for article published in Maternal and Child Health Journal, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
Title
The Intergenerational Transmission of Low Birth Weight and Intrauterine Growth Restriction: A Large Cross-generational Cohort Study in Taiwan
Published in
Maternal and Child Health Journal, February 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10995-017-2276-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mengcen Qian, Shin-Yi Chou, Lea Gimenez, Jin-Tan Liu

Abstract

Objectives Our research provides evidence on the intergenerational fetal programming effect by examining associations in the low birth weight (LBW, birth weight <2500 g) and intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) status between two adjacent generations from both the maternal and paternal sides. Methods Birth certificate data of the entire Taiwanese population are used to construct three-consecutive-generational samples. The final samples consist of the third-generation children born during 1999-2006 to at least one second-generation (G2) parent born during 1978-1985. Maternal and paternal samples are distinguished based on the gender of G2. We first fit the samples with linear probability models while including extensive explanatory variables to control for myriad confounding factors. We then include G2 sibling fixed effects to account for family-specific heterogeneity. Alternative explanations of sample selection, parents' assortative mating, and grandmothers' postnatal investment are examined. Results We find that significant intergenerational associations in LBW and IUGR only occur matrilineally. Children born to LBW mothers are 2.28 (95% CI, 0.71-3.85; p < 0.01) percentage points, corresponding to 36%, more likely to be LBW compared to children born to non-LBW mothers who are sisters. These associations cannot be explained by the above alternative explanations. Conclusions Under G2 sibling comparisons, children born to LBW (IUGR) mothers are more likely to be LBW (IUGR), but children born to LBW (IUGR) fathers are not. The findings suggest that maternal health is pertinent and that socio-economic interventions may not yield the desired outcomes within a short period of time.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 62 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 16%
Student > Bachelor 9 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 10%
Student > Master 6 10%
Other 4 6%
Other 11 18%
Unknown 16 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 11%
Psychology 7 11%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 19 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2018.
All research outputs
#3,149,425
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from Maternal and Child Health Journal
#310
of 2,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,217
of 426,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Maternal and Child Health Journal
#12
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,039 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,346 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.