↓ Skip to main content

Hsa-miR-370 inhibited P-selectin-induced cell adhesion in human colon adenocarcinoma cells

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Hsa-miR-370 inhibited P-selectin-induced cell adhesion in human colon adenocarcinoma cells
Published in
Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, June 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11010-018-3382-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yunhai Wei, Jie Shao, Yan Wang, Hua Shen, Sheng Yu, Jinyu Zhang, Lei Yin

Abstract

Sialyl Lewis x (sLex) is a minimal recognition motif for ligands of P-selectin and plays an important role in tumor cell adhesion and migration. Thus, targeting sLex could be an effective method to prevent tumor metastasis. In this study, we aimed to identify a microRNA (miRNA) which is capable to suppress the expression of sLex. MicroRNAs which may target ST3GAL4 were predicted by the online tools. Colo 320 HSR human colon adenocarcinoma cells were employed. The transcriptional and translational levels of ST3GAL4 were evaluated by western blotting and Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Cell adhesion and spread were assessed with or without hsa-miR-370 treatment. It was shown that hsa-miR-370 inhibited the expression of sLex in colo-320 cells, which repressed the binding of P-selectin, and led to reduced cell attachment and spread. Our results found that P-selectin-induced elevations of p-p38 and p-PI3K levels were significantly inhibited by hsa-miR-370, indicating that repressed sLex level is able to reduce the P-selectin binding and therefore eliminating the P-selectin-induced activation of p38 and PI3K signaling. In conclusion, we found that hsa-miR-370 specifically inhibits the expression of sLex, represses cell adhesion and spreading in colo-320 cells. Our study provides a possible effective treatment against tumor invasion.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 25%
Other 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 25%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2018.
All research outputs
#18,639,173
of 23,090,520 outputs
Outputs from Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry
#1,580
of 2,327 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#252,990
of 328,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry
#11
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,090,520 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,327 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,040 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.