↓ Skip to main content

Pros and cons of ultra-high-field MRI/MRS for human application

Overview of attention for article published in Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#25 of 338)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
patent
3 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
648 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Pros and cons of ultra-high-field MRI/MRS for human application
Published in
Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, June 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.pnmrs.2018.06.001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 648 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 648 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 115 18%
Researcher 83 13%
Student > Bachelor 56 9%
Student > Master 56 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 3%
Other 77 12%
Unknown 239 37%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 79 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 64 10%
Neuroscience 55 8%
Physics and Astronomy 49 8%
Chemistry 20 3%
Other 108 17%
Unknown 273 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2026.
All research outputs
#3,612,461
of 34,146,621 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
#25
of 338 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,164
of 373,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,146,621 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 338 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,377 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them