↓ Skip to main content

Can the Lamberts and Lambert Submaximal Cycle Test Indicate Fatigue and Recovery in Trained Cyclists?

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Can the Lamberts and Lambert Submaximal Cycle Test Indicate Fatigue and Recovery in Trained Cyclists?
Published in
International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, August 2015
DOI 10.1123/ijspp.2015-0119
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel Hammes, Sabrina Skorski, Sascha Schwindling, Alexander Ferrauti, Mark Pfeiffer, Michael Kellmann, Tim Meyer

Abstract

The Lamberts and Lambert Submaximal Cycle Test (LSCT) is a novel test designed to monitor performance, and fatigue/recovery in cyclists. Studies have shown the ability to predict performance; however, there is a lack of studies concerning monitoring of fatigue/recovery. 23 trained male cyclists (31±9y, VO2max: 59.4±7.4 ml/min/kg) completed a training camp. The LSCT was conducted at day 1, day 8, and day 11. After day 1, an intensive 6-day training period was performed. Between day 8 and day 11, recovery period was realized. The LSCT consists of three stages with fixed heart rates of 6min at 60% and 80% and 3min at 90% of maximum heart rate. During the stages, power output and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) were determined. Heart rate recovery (HRR) was measured after stage 3. Power output almost certainly (standardized mean difference: 1.0) and RPE very likely (1.7) increased from day 1 to day 8 at stage 2. Power output likely (0.4) and RPE almost certainly (2.6) increased at stage 3. From day 8 to day 11, power output possibly (-0.4) and RPE likely (-1.5) decreased at stage 2 and possibly (-0.1) and almost certainly (-1.9) at stage 3. HRR was likely (0.7) accelerated from day 1 to day 8. Changes from day 8 to day 11 were unclear (-0.1). The LSCT can be used for monitoring fatigue and recovery, since parameters were responsive to a fatiguing training and a following recovery period. However, consideration of multiple LSCT variables is required to interpret the results correctly.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 75 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 17%
Researcher 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Lecturer 5 6%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 18 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 40 52%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 21 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2023.
All research outputs
#4,536,601
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance
#929
of 2,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,487
of 275,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance
#17
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,164 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,219 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.