↓ Skip to main content

Cardioprotective and functional effects of levosimendan and milrinone in mice with cecal ligation and puncture-induced sepsis

Overview of attention for article published in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Cardioprotective and functional effects of levosimendan and milrinone in mice with cecal ligation and puncture-induced sepsis
Published in
Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology, June 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00210-018-1527-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shigeyuki Yamashita, Tokiko Suzuki, Keisuke Iguchi, Takuya Sakamoto, Kengo Tomita, Hiroki Yokoo, Mari Sakai, Hiroki Misawa, Kohshi Hattori, Toshi Nagata, Yasuhide Watanabe, Naoyuki Matsuda, Naoki Yoshimura, Yuichi Hattori

Abstract

Levosimendan and milrinone may be used in place of dobutamine to increase cardiac output in septic patients with a low cardiac output due to impaired cardiac function. The effects of the two inotropic agents on cardiac inflammation and left ventricular (LV) performance were examined in mice with cecal ligation and puncture (CLP)-induced sepsis. CLP mice displayed significant cardiac inflammation, as indicated by highly increased pro-inflammatory cytokines and neutrophil infiltration in myocardial tissues. When continuously given, levosimendan prevented but milrinone exaggerated cardiac inflammation, but they significantly reduced the elevations in plasma cardiac troponin-I and heart-type fatty acid-binding protein, clinical markers of cardiac injury. Echocardiographic assessment of cardiac function showed that the effect of levosimendan, given by an intravenous bolus injection, on LV performance was impaired in CLP mice, whereas milrinone produced inotropic responses equally in sham-operated and CLP mice. A lesser effect of levosimendan on LV performance after CLP was also found in spontaneously beating Langendorff-perfused hearts. In ventricular myocytes isolated from control and CLP mice, levosimendan, but not milrinone, caused a large increase in the L-type calcium current. This study represents that levosimendan and milrinone have cardioprotective properties but provide different advantages and drawbacks to cardiac inflammation/dysfunction in sepsis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 3 14%
Researcher 3 14%
Student > Master 3 14%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 7 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 33%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 10%
Decision Sciences 1 5%
Unknown 9 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2018.
All research outputs
#18,639,173
of 23,090,520 outputs
Outputs from Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology
#1,484
of 1,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#253,007
of 328,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology
#8
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,090,520 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,752 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,081 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.