| Title |
Quantitative size-factors for metallic solid solutions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Materials Science, February 1966
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00549722 |
| Authors |
H. W. King |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 250 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 246 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 85 | 34% |
| Researcher | 32 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 34 | 14% |
| Unknown | 40 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Materials Science | 114 | 46% |
| Engineering | 25 | 10% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 22 | 9% |
| Chemistry | 20 | 8% |
| Chemical Engineering | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 3% |
| Unknown | 60 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2024.
All research outputs
#7,464,917
of 22,821,814 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science
#935
of 4,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#964
of 11,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,821,814 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,612 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 11,068 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them