You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Signs and symptoms in diagnosing acute myocardial infarction and acute coronary syndrome: a diagnostic meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, February 2008
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp08x277014 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rudi Bruyninckx, Bert Aertgeerts, Pieter Bruyninckx, Frank Buntinx |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 20% |
| Ireland | 1 | 10% |
| Brazil | 1 | 10% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 70% |
| Scientists | 2 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 207 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 203 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 49 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 17 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 6% |
| Researcher | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 37 | 18% |
| Unknown | 50 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 88 | 43% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 30 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 8% |
| Unknown | 55 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2022.
All research outputs
#2,180,532
of 22,821,814 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#1,051
of 4,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,782
of 157,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#5
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,821,814 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,279 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 157,003 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.