You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The role of precipitation type, intensity, and spatial distribution in source water quality after wildfire
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Research Letters (ERL), August 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1088/1748-9326/10/8/084007 |
| Authors |
Sheila F Murphy, Jeffrey H Writer, R Blaine McCleskey, Deborah A Martin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Mexico | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 135 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 18% |
| Researcher | 19 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 9% |
| Other | 13 | 9% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Unknown | 29 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 35 | 26% |
| Engineering | 22 | 16% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 16 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 9% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Unknown | 39 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2015.
All research outputs
#2,267,066
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Research Letters (ERL)
#2,520
of 6,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,521
of 275,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Research Letters (ERL)
#40
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,022 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 51.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,827 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.