↓ Skip to main content

Patient-centric design of long-term care networks

Overview of attention for article published in Health Care Management Science, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
Patient-centric design of long-term care networks
Published in
Health Care Management Science, May 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10729-018-9445-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul Intrevado, Vedat Verter, Lucie Tremblay

Abstract

Long-term care networks may soon buckle under the weight of overwhelming demand. We present two dynamic, large-scale mixed-integer programs for long-term care network design that execute jointly strategic and tactical facility location, modular capacity acquisition, and patient-assignment decisions. The first model is an adaptive network-design model whose focus is more strategic in nature, whereas the second model focuses exclusively on the expansion of an existing long-term care network and incorporates additional tactical decisions such as patient backlogs. Working directly with the president of the Order of Québec Nurses-the provincial organization representing over 75,000 nurses-we incorporate facets such as assignment permanence, as well as develop and measure patient-centric quality-of-life proxies such as geographic mis-assignment and un-assigned patients, the latter of which is quantified via parametric optimization. Various network-design and patient-assignment policies are explored. We conclude that the use of home care as an alternative to long-term care facilities is cost prohibitive under specific conditions. Employing a bisection algorithm, we identify the implicit cost placed on keeping medically stable elderly patients in a hospital ward, concluding no cost savings are generated from such a policy. The model is analyzed and validated using empirical data from the long-term care network in Montréal, Canada.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 6 13%
Researcher 6 13%
Student > Master 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Professor 3 7%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 16 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 5 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 7%
Mathematics 2 4%
Other 10 22%
Unknown 19 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2019.
All research outputs
#20,522,137
of 23,090,520 outputs
Outputs from Health Care Management Science
#270
of 286 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#290,611
of 331,257 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Care Management Science
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,090,520 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 286 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,257 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.