| Title |
What drives the comparability effect of mandatory IFRS adoption?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Review of Accounting Studies, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11142-014-9296-5 |
| Authors |
Stefano Cascino, Joachim Gassen |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 338 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 332 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 82 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 45 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 26 | 8% |
| Researcher | 22 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 20 | 6% |
| Other | 76 | 22% |
| Unknown | 67 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 191 | 57% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 47 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 1% |
| Engineering | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 2% |
| Unknown | 76 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2021.
All research outputs
#5,060,796
of 24,024,220 outputs
Outputs from Review of Accounting Studies
#51
of 202 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,048
of 232,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Review of Accounting Studies
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,024,220 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 202 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,550 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.