↓ Skip to main content

Arthroscopic rotator cuff surgery following shoulder trauma improves outcome despite additional pathologies and slow recovery

Overview of attention for article published in Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
Title
Arthroscopic rotator cuff surgery following shoulder trauma improves outcome despite additional pathologies and slow recovery
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, May 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00167-018-4969-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Barak Haviv, Tal Frenkel Rutenberg, Shlomo Bronak, Mustafa Yassin

Abstract

To compare the outcome, recovery and surgical findings after shoulder arthroscopy of clinically defined traumatic and non-traumatic rotator cuff pathology in middle-aged patients. Of the patients who underwent rotator cuff surgery, 37 patients who reported a preceding shoulder injury related to their shoulder symptoms (traumatic group) were compared to a control group of 58 patients without a preceding injury (non-traumatic group), matched by age, body mass index and comorbidities. Data included demographic details, patient history, surgical findings, the Oxford Shoulder Score questionnaires and overall satisfaction from surgery. The mean follow-up time was 33.2 ± 14.4 months. More concomitant pathologies were found in the study group. The proportion of large and massive supraspinatus tears was double in the study group (43%) compared to the control group (22%). The Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) improved significantly after surgery in both groups (p < 0.001) with no differences between groups in OSS and overall satisfaction from surgery. Patients in the study group felt recovered at an average time of 6.1 ± 4.6 months from surgery, while patients in the control group felt recovered at 4.2 ± 2.6 months (p = 0.02). Patients who were operated at the first 6 months after the injury had better improvement in OSS than patients who were operated later. Surgical arthroscopy for rotator pathology of the shoulder in middle-aged patients improved pain and function regardless of a traumatic onset; however, earlier repair after trauma resulted in better outcome scores. Larger full-thickness tears and concomitant pathologies were more common after injury. Level III.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Postgraduate 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 3 7%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 19 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 20%
Psychology 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Sports and Recreations 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 20 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2018.
All research outputs
#20,522,137
of 23,092,602 outputs
Outputs from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#2,468
of 2,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#287,688
of 326,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#33
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,092,602 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,680 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,747 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.